|
WEDNESDAY,
JANUARY 18, 2006
6:30
P.M.
AGENDA
Call to Order:
Pledge of Allegiance:
Introduction:
Approval of Agenda:
Call to the Public: (Please Note:
The Board will not begin any new business after 10:00 p.m.)
1. 06-01…A request by Palo Homes, Inc., Section 17, 3368
Crooked Lake Road, for a side yard variance to construct a detached
accessory structure.
2. 06-02…A request by Paul Lalewicz, Section 30, 2929 E. Coon
Lake Road, for a variance to split property into two nonconforming
parcels.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS:
A. Approval of minutes for the December 13, 2005 Zoning Board of
Appeals meeting.
B. Correspondence
C. Member Discussion
D. Adjournment
MINUTES
Chairman
Doug Brown called the regular meeting of the Zoning Board of appeals
to order at 6:30 p.m. at the Genoa Township Hall. The Pledge of the
Allegiance was then said. The following board members were present
constituting a quorum for transaction of business: Doug Brown, Steve
Wildman, Barbara Figurski, Kevin Brady and Joe Perri. Also present
was Township staff member Adam Van Tassell and approximately 6
persons in the audience.
Chairman Brown gave a brief introduction
of the board members and on why the Zoning Board of Appeals exists.
Moved
by Figurski, supported by Wildman, to approve the agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
A call to the public was made for non
agenda items with no response.
06-01…A
request by Palo Homes, Inc., Section 17, 3368 Crooked Lake Road, for
a side yard variance to construct a detached accessory structure.
A call to the public was made with no response.
Moved
by Brady, supported by Perri, to approve case #06-01 for petitioner
Palo Homes, it is for a one side setback for 25 feet with a variance
amount of 15 feet. The practical difficulty being the soils on the
property and the topography of the property by not allowing for any
other placement of the structure with the setback critiera. Motion
carried unanimously.
06-02…A
request by Paul Lalewicz, Section 30, 2929 E. Coon Lake Road, for a
variance to split property into two nonconforming parcels.
A call to the public was made with the
following response: Bruce Hundley- 3056 Coon Lake Road, I own four 5
acre parcels. We are against the urban sprawl. I don’t really
think the infrastructure can support the splits and development at
this time. I have kids as well. Will I be able to split my parcels
into eight 21/2 acre parcels. People that are grandfathered belong
there. I don’t agree with deviating from the master plan. Betty
Hundley-3056 Coon Lake Road, before we bought our property we looked
at the existing land use and the future land use map. It is to be
left 5 acre estate property. There are surrounding parcels are
available that meet the 5 acre requirement. I do believe that there
are traffic issues. Until the infrastructure allows for some turn
lanes, there is a safety issue.
Moved
by Figurski, supported by Perri, to deny case #06-02 requested by
Paul Lalewicz for 2929 E. Coon Lake Road due to the zoning ordinance
still being in place for country estates for the property in
question. Practical difficulty was not shown related to the land. Motion
carried unanimously.
Moved by
Figurski, supported by Wildman, to approve the December 13th, 2005
Zoning Board of Appeals minutes with changes.
Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
|