|
June
10, 2003
7:00 p.m.
AGENDA
02-56
A request by
Charles Fillion, Section 28, 4089 Homestead, for a variance to construct
an addition and an attached garage on an existing non-conforming
building.
03-27
A request by
Thomas and Beverly Smith, Section 10, 5424 Wildwood, for a rear yard,
side yard and front yard variance to construct a new home.
03-28
A request by
Thomas OBrien, Section 16, 4290 Sweet Road, for a 14 foot side variance
to construct an attached garage.
03-30
A request by
Dennis Ling, Section 10, 1840 Gray Road, for a size variance to
construct a pole barn.
03-31
A request by
Robert McColl, Section 7, 2610 Chilson Meadows, for a height and size
yard variance to construct a pole barn.
03-32
A request by
Stuart and Sylvia Willner, Section 28, 4121 Homestead, is for a rear
yard and side yard variance to construct an addition.
03-33
A request by
Douglas Noggle and Marilyn Jamieson, Section 22, 4336 Highcrest, is for
a revision of a condition for a previously granted variance.
MINUTES
Chairman Rick Staley called a regular meeting of the
Zoning Board of Appeals to order at 7:00 p.m. at the Genoa Township
Hall. The Pledge of Allegiance was then said. The following members of
the Zoning Board of Appeals were present constituting a quorum for the
transaction of business: Rick Staley, Barbara Figurski, Chris Hensick,
Jean Ledford and Dean Tengel. Also present were Township Ordinance
Enforcement Officer Adam VanTassell and approximately 25 persons in the
audience.
A call to the public was made with no response.
Moved by Ledford, supported by Figurski, to approve the Agenda as
submitted. The motion carried unanimously.
02-56
A request by Charles Fillion, Section 28, 4089 Homestead, for a
variance to construct an addition and an attached garage on an existing
non-conforming building.
A call to the public was made with the following response: Steve Collett
I will lose my view of the lake if this petition is granted. Pat
Ellerhold The lot is pie shaped and I would like to see an official
survey before any house is built. Lily Gillespie I have owned my lot
for 51 years. The original house is not 5 from the property line.
Moved by Hensick, supported by Ledford, to table (at the petitioners
request until the July meeting of the ZBA) with the Fillions considering
a review of their application with a possible reduction in the size,
scope and projection toward the water of the building. The height is
restricted to the ordinance designation for Lake Shore Residential and
will be included on future site plan drawings. The motion carried
unanimously.
03-27
A request by Thomas and Beverly Smith, Section 10, 5424
Wildwood, for a rear yard, side yard and front yard variance to
construct a new home.
A call to the public was made with the following response: Leonard Wilde
This proposal would benefit the neighborhood and I am in favor of the
request. Moved by Hensick, supported by Ledford, to allow a residential
structure and two-car attached garage within the footprint provided for
a single story structure with an attic and approximately 1250 sq. ft. of
living space on the main floor. Further, the petitioner has agreed that
any portion of the structure above the ground floor will not be finished
as living space and will not include plumbing or heating. The variances
granted are as follows: 19 front, 3 north side, 31.4 road side, 20
waterfront with lot coverage not to exceed 41% for the building surface.
This action is contingent upon the shed and part of the ramp being
removed and the home will be guttered with all water retained on this
property. The practical difficulty is the unusual shape of the lot. The
motion carried as follows: Ayes Hensick, Ledford, Tengel and Staley.
Nay Figurski.
03-28
A request by Thomas OBrien, Section 16, 4290 Sweet Road, for a
14 foot side variance to construct an attached garage.
A call to the public was made with no response. Moved by Ledford,
supported by Hensick, to approve the construction of a single-story
garage measuring 28 x 28 with a 14 side yard variance. The
extraordinary circumstance is the location of the pond and septic field
and the steep incline that will not allow construction in another
location. The motion carried unanimously.
03-30
A request by Dennis Ling, Section 10, 1840 Gray Road, for a
size variance to construct a pole barn.
A call to the public was made with no response. Mr. Ling advised the
board that he needed the variance for storage of vehicles a 30
trailer, van, motor home, tools and other vehicles. No hardship was
presented related to the land. Moved by Figurski, supported by Ledford,
to deny the request since no hardship or practical difficulty was
presented other than self-imposed. The motion carried unanimously.
03-31
A request by Robert McColl, Section 7, 2610 Chilson Meadows,
for a height and size yard variance to construct a pole barn.
A call to the public was made with no response. Mr. McColl advised the
board that the zoning on his property was rural residential and that the
property really should be country estate since all parcels in that area
exceeded the five acre minimum with the exception of parcels along
Chilson Road. He did not feel that he should personally make an
application for rezoning since that would be considered spot zoning.
Perhaps the township would consider taking this matter up at a later
date since it appears that the property should never have been rezoned
to rural residential.
Moved by Hensick, supported by Ledford, to deny the request since no
hardship or practical difficulty associated with the land was presented.
The motion carried unanimously.
03-32
A request by Stuart and Sylvia Willner, Section 28, 4121
Homestead, is for a rear yard and side yard variance to construct an
addition.
A call to the public was made with the following response: Tom Rafferty
I have no objection to this petition being granted. It will enhance
the neighborhood. Annette Dubanik It appears that the Zoning Board of
Appeals in their granting of variances has now created a plan for our
community. Moved by Ledford, supported by Tengel, to grant a 46 side
yard variance and a 2210 rear yard variance for the construction of an
addition. This action is contingent upon removal of an existing shed on
the east side. The height of the home will meet the 25 requirement. The
practical difficulty is the configuration of the land and the placement
of the existing structure which will not allow expansion elsewhere. The
motion carried as follows: Ayes Ledford, Tengel and Staley. Nay Hensick
and Figurski.
03-33
A request by Douglas Noggle and Marilyn Jamieson, Section 22,
4336 Highcrest, is for a revision of a condition for a previously
granted variance.
Mr. Noggle advised the board that the home was completed a couple years
ago but that the shed was not taken down because they understood that
they were allowed to keep 370 sq. ft. for storage, since no one
complained they have not done anything. Even though the minutes of the
meeting from May 12, 1998 state that the existing building will be
removed within 60 days of a certificate of occupancy being issued they
still believe that they could retain part of that building. Now they
would like a variance to continue the use of the out building. A call to
the public was made with the following response: Richard Ziminski
These people believe they can do anything they want on this lot. Code
does not allow two homes on one site. The parking is atrocious and the
shed should be taken down. They are running a business from this shed.
Frank Castle There are trucks going in and out of there all the time.
It appears to be a business. Marilyn Jamieson My husband is a mason
and we have equipment that needs to be stored. Mr. Ziminski has not
taken down his shed from when he was granted a variance. Beth Genung
The petitioner has done a beautiful job with the house and I have no
objection to the variance being granted. Tim Holliday This side of the
lake is hilly. I see no problem with the existing structure.
Moved by Hensick, supported by Figurski, to deny the application to
modify the variance granted on May 12, 1998 for the reason that the
existing residence was to serve only during construction of the new
home. The petitioner has admitted to not complying with the removal of
the house hoping that the township would not observe its retention. The
minutes of the 05/12/98 meeting state clearly The existing building
will be removed within 60 days of the certificate of occupancy being
issued. The motion to deny was voted and carried unanimously.
Moved by Tengel, supported by Figurski, to approve the Minutes of the
May 20, 2003 regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals with Staley
abstaining. The motion carried unanimously.
The regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was adjourned at 9:30
p.m.
Paulette A. Skolarus
Genoa Township Clerk
|
