A Call to the Public was made with no
response.
01-48 A request by Brian Lynn, Section
10, 733 Pathway, for a 27 foot rear yard and a 6-foot side yard
variance to construct an attached garage.
A Call to the Public was made with no
response. Moved by Ledford, supported by Hensick, to move the petition
to Item #5 on the agenda. The motion carried unanimously.
01-52 A request by George Atsalis,
section 9, 1093 Sunrise Park, is for a 59 side-yard variance to
enclose a porch.
A Call to the Public was made with the
following response: Todd and Karen Woods- we live across the street at
1096Sunrise Park; it does not block our view of the lake and we have
no objection to this variance. Moved by Hensick, supported by Ledford,
to deny the petitioners based upon the lack of any new evidence and
therefore no distiniction from the petitioner's application at the
July 2001 meeting and the action taken by the Board in July. The
motion failed as follows: Ayes- Stornant and Hensick. Nays- Staley and
Ledford. Moved by Ledford and supported by Stornant, to refer matter
to Township Attorney for further legal opinion and table until a reply
is received. The motion was approved as follows: Ayes- Ledford,
Stornant and Staley. Nay- Hensick.
01-52A request by George Kandler,
Section 12, 1475 S. Hacker, is for a 1-foot west front yard and a 22
foot east front yard to construct an addition.
A Call to the Public was made with no
response. Moved by Hensick, supported by Ledford, to grant a variance
to petitioner to permit a West Side setback of 49 feet with a 1foot
variance and an East Side setback of 28 foot with a 22-foot variance
to permit an addition consistent with the plans submitted. The
practical difficulty is the unusual configuration of the lot. The
motion carried unanimously.
01-54 A request by Warren Signs,
Section 5, 741 Victory Drive, is for a variance to allow square
footage outside of section 16 of the ordinance.
A Call to the Public was made with the
following response: Bill Leary, I did not know what the plan was and
after reviewing the drawings had no problem with variance. Moved by
Ledford, supported by Stornant, to deny request due to the size of the
sign. The petitioner presented no practical difficulties. The motion
carried unanimously.
01-55 A request by Grand River
Meadowview Association, Section 6, North side of Grand River on the
corner of Meadowview and Grand River, is for a 9-foot front yard and a
19-foot rear yard variance to construct retail building.
A Call to the Public was made with the
following response: Chad Ormsbee, 170 Westdale, I am concerned about 1
foot off the property line and with hours and lighting, Ormsbee has a
pool with a 6 foot fence shrubs would not help. Staley stated these
concerns should have been taken up at the Planning commission. Moved
by Hensick, supported by Ledford, to grant a 1-foot front yard parking
lot setback with a 9foot variance and 19-foot rear yard parking lot
variance with a 1-foot setback with construction of 6 foot retaining
wall with the condition the owner maintains the brick wall throughout
its natural life. The practical difficulty is the unusual
configuration of the lot. The motion carried unanimously.
01-48 A request by Brian Lynn, Section
10,733 Pathway, for a 27 foot rear yard and a 6-foot side yard
variance to construct an attached garage.
A Call to the Public was made with no
response. Tabled until next meeting.
The regular meeting of the Zoning Board
of Appeals was adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Amy Ruthig
