|
Planning Commission Meeting JUNE
12, 2006
WORKSESSION AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
DISCUSSION: of Agenda items of the regular meeting
of the Planning Commission
DISCUSSION: of general items
ADJOURNMENT:
PUBLIC
HEARING AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
CALL TO THE PUBLIC: (Note: The Board will not
begin any new business after 10:00 p.m.)
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 1…Review of an extension of
site plan and impact assessment approval to construct a 7,820 sq.ft.
office and showroom building for Pro Brothers Windows and Sunroom
located on the south side of Grand River Ave., between Dorr Road and
Kellogg Road. Sec. 14, petitioned by Pro Bros.
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A.
Recommendation of impact assessment extension.
B. Disposition
of site plan extension.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 2… Review of sketch plan
application and impact assessment for a change to a previously approved
site plan for a proposed 26,868 sq. ft. addition to existing Cleary
University located at 3750 Cleary Drive, Sec. 5, petitioned by Cleary
University. (06-11)
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A.
Recommendation regarding impact assessment. (04-14-06)
B. Disposition
regarding site plan. (05-22-06)
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 3… Review of site plan
application and impact assessment to construct a 26,000 sq. ft. retail
building located in Sec. 13 at the northwest corner of Grand River and
Genoa Business Park Drive, petitioned by Tech Express Corporation.
(06-04)
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A.
Recommendation regarding impact assessment. (04-20-06)
B. Disposition
regarding site plan. (05-23-06)
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 4…Review of site plan
application and impact assessment for a parking lot expansion and
related site improvements to the existing office utilitized by Desine
Inc., located at 2183 Pless Dr., Sec. 13, petitioned by Desine Inc.
(06-10)
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A.
Recommendation regarding impact assessment. (05-24-06)
B. Disposition
regarding site plan. (05-24-06)
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 5…Review of site plan
application, private road application and impact assessment for 40 acres
zoned Country Estates (CE) located on the west side of Kellogg Road,
north of McClements Road, Sec. 2, petitioned by Palace Construction.
(06-13)
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A.
Recommendation of impact assessment. (05-24-06)
B. Disposition
of private road site plan. (05-24-06)
Administrative Business:
Planners report presented by LSL Planners
Approval of May 22, 2006 Planning Commission meeting minutes
Member Discussion
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER: The work session of the Planning
Commission was called to order by Chairman Don Pobuda at 6:31 pm. The
following commission members were present constituting a quorum for
transaction of business: Don Pobuda, Barbara Figurski, James Mortensen,
Steve Morgan, and Dean Tengel. Also present were Kelly VanMarter, Township
Planner; Brian Borden from Langworthy, Strader, LeBlanc & Associates,
Inc., Tesha Humphriss from TetraTech,
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Motion by Barbara Figurski to
approve agenda. Support by Dean Tengle. Motion carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION: of Agenda items of the regular meeting of
the Planning Commission
DISCUSSION: of general items
ADJOURNMENT: At 7.02 p.m., meeting adjourned.
CALL TO ORDER: The public hearing of the Planning
Commission was called to order at 7: 06 pm.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was
recited by the Board and a moment of silence was observed.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Upon motion of Barbara Figurski and
support of James Mortensen, the agenda is approved as presented. Motion
carried unanimously.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC: (Note: The Board will not
begin any new business after 10:00 p.m.) No members of the public
expressed interest in addressing the Planning Commission.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 1…Review of an extension of site
plan and impact assessment approval to construct a 7,820 sq.ft. office and
showroom building for Pro Brothers Windows and Sunroom located on the south
side of Grand River Ave., between Dorr Road and Kellogg Road. Sec. 14,
petitioned by Pro Bros.
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A.
Recommendation of impact assessment extension.
B.
Disposition of site plan extension.
Don Provenzola present from Pro Brothers. Neither of the
consultants wish to address any issues on this public hearing.
Motion by James
Mortensen that a recommendation be made to the Township Board an extension
of one year on the impact assessment on the site plan for Pro Brothers
Windows. Support by Barbara Figurski.
Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion by James
Mortensen that the site plan extension be approved for a period of one year.
Support by Barbara Figurski.
Motion carried
unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 2… Review of sketch plan
application and impact assessment for a change to a previously approved site
plan for a proposed 26,868 sq. ft. addition to existing Cleary University
located at 3750 Cleary Drive, Sec. 5, petitioned by Cleary University.
(06-11)
Planning
Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation
regarding impact assessment. (04-14-06)
B. Disposition
regarding site plan. (05-22-06)
Craig Zokas and Mike Baker from Schonsheck were present.
Mike Baker addresses the issue of the loading zone. There is no loading zone
and deliveries would be taking place through the front door. Brian Borden
indicates the large circular area in front of the building is sufficient for
their needs and the requirements of the ordinance.
Mike Baker indicates they’re requesting a waiver of the
detention pond requirements. He indicates that the trees currently existing
are superior to the planned landscaping around the detention pond. Brian
Borden indicates three of the trees are ash trees and are to be in good
health. Brian Borden suggests that the existing trees are of good quality
and health. The only trees that are being removed are those absolutely
necessary per Mike Baker. Barbara Figurski inquires as to whether any trees
that died would be replaced. The requirement is 14 canopy or evergreen and
132 shrubs. Tesha Humphriss agrees with petitioner that the tree’s canopy
is a rough estimate of the root system’s size. She agrees with their plan.
There are no guarantees whether the trees will survive the “shaking” of
the ground. The University agrees that they would maintain the area with
mowing, cutting scrub, etc., per Craig Zolkos. It will be manicured. James
Mortensen suggests that the motion should hold to the ordinance, but it may
be waived prior to occupancy by Township Staff.
Craig Zolkos addresses the engineering issues. He indicates
there are two reasons for this taking two years: one, they were forced to
re-engineer Belle Tire’s detention pond and then they had to find another
spot to place the pond. The second reason is that Cleary University had to
go through a fundraising campaign to gather the monies for this project. He
has addressed all of the concerns of Tetra Tech and indicates they intend to
comply with all of the concerns expressed by Tesha Humphriss. Brian Borden
has nothing to add.
Tesha Humphriss indicates that Belle Tire has moved their
detention pond. She indicates there has been a major re-design to the site
and that has caused many of the delays and issues. She is confident that she
can make the new location work for the detention pond. She would like items
one through five of her letter to be added to the plans. As to item number
one, petitioner suggests that existing drain was removed and the district is
now on the south line. Tesha Humphriss agrees. The second item is in
relation to the area of the access drive, water tower and detention pond. It
appears that water would flow from the east side over the road to the
detention pond. Elevations will be added per petitioner. Number three can be
removed. Petitioner will do so. Number four, the petitioner is proposing one
design with three inlets. Tesha Humphriss will need to see the elevations
for all three inlets and outlets.
The Drain Commissioner has requested them to pursue the
building of a berm to assist in drainage for the property. Tesha Humphriss
requests that petitioner continue working with the Drain Commissioner to
find a mutually acceptable solution to the area on the west property line.
Petitioner is required to submit construction plans for the
water main.
Brian Borden indicates minimum planting requirements are
exceeded as a whole and specifically at the detention pond.
Motion by
Barbara Figurski to recommend to the Township Board approval of the impact
assessment. Support by James Mortensen.
Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion by James
Mortensen to recommend to Township Board approval of the site plan subject
to the following:
1. All existing tax
codes on site will be combined into one;
2. The petitioner
will install 14 canopy or evergreen trees and 132 shrubs in a detention pond
area. If, however, after grading, Township Staff determines that the
majority of the 46 existing trees in the area are surviving or are likely to
survive, some or all of the additional requirements may be waived;
3. All requirements
in Tetra Tech’s letter of June 7, 2006 will be complied with. In the case
of item number six, the issue of offsite grading must be satisfactorily
addressed with the Drain Commission, the evidence of which shall be provided
to the Township Engineer. In addition, a revised site plan will be supplied
to the Township Engineer for review prior to submission to the Township
Board.
Support by Dean
Tengle.
Motion carried
unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
# 3… Review of site plan application and impact assessment to
construct a 26,000 sq. ft. retail building located in Sec. 13 at the
northwest corner of Grand River and Genoa Business Park Drive, petitioned by
Tech Express Corporation. (06-04)
Planning Commission
disposition of petition
A. Recommendation
regarding impact assessment. (04-20-06)
B. Disposition
regarding site plan. (05-23-06)
Petitioner is present via Conrad Stauch, 28345 Beck Road,
Wixom, Michigan. John Damrath from Tech Express 28227 Beck Road, Wixom,
Michigan is also present. Mr. Stauch indicates they’d like to go forward
with the project, with or without the restaurant. He would like to keep the
parking currently allotted even if no restaurant is placed within the
building at this time. He would prefer the parking not be banked. He
indicates they will gladly participate in any improvements that need to be
done to accommodate traffic, but would not be willing to bear the cost
himself. He will participate pro rata.
Brian Borden indicates that the plans continue to improve.
Without a restaurant, they’re at 146% of the parking requirements. If the
Planning Commission requires banked parking, they will have to eliminate 20
spaces. Steve Morgan indicates he’d leave it as is. Barbara Figurski and
James Mortensen indicate the same. Dean Tengle agrees.
Brian Borden addresses the minor inconsistencies on the
landscaping plan. Petitioner indicates a willingness to provide updated
plans.
Tesha Humphriss addresses the discrepancy between the
boundary line and the legal description. Petitioner will address this and
will comply with Genoa Township details.
Tesha Humphriss addresses the water service. Petitioner
indicates if a restaurant comes in, they can pay for the additional R.E.U.’s.
James Mortensen indicates that the restaurant references should be
eliminated from the impact assessment. Construction plans are required for
DEQ water permits. The Building Department must address the sanitary sewer,
etc. As it relates to traffic, Tesha Humphriss indicates a traffic impact
study has been submitted. The southbound traffic is the only problem. The
recommended improvements are a signal at Genoa Business Park Drive and Grand
River and the installation of a right hand turn lane. The Road Commission
indicates a signal is not necessary at this time, but if it becomes
necessary, they’ll support it. Petitioner indicates they will pay a
proportionate share of the costs of a traffic control device.
Kelly VanMarter indicates that a revised letter from the
Brighton Fire Department has not yet been submitted. She suggests that
approval should be obtained prior to land use issuance.
Motion by
Barbara Figurski to recommend to the Township Board approval of the impact
assessment, subject to:
1. All references to
a restaurant shall be eliminated.
2.
The property owner may be required to make a financial contribution toward
alleviating any traffic impact.
Support
by James Mortensen.
Motion
carried unanimously.
Motion
by James Mortensen to recommend to Township Board approval of site plan
subject to:
1.
The inconsistencies between the number of plantings shown on the landscape
plan and the table will be corrected.
2.
The requirements of the Township Engineer as spelled out in Tetra Tech’s
letter of June 7, 2006 will be complied with, in particular number five, a
revised traffic study showing the impact before and after this site plan
construction will be provided prior to the Township Board review; and
3.
Requirements of the Brighton Area Fire Department will be complied with
prior to Township Board approval.
4.
The materials and colors reviewed previously by the Planning Commission are
acceptable.
5.
The landscaping will be irrigated.
Support
by Steve Morgan.
Motion
carried unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 4…Review of site plan
application and impact assessment for a parking lot expansion and related
site improvements to the existing office utilitized by Desine Inc., located
at 2183 Pless Dr., Sec. 13, petitioned by Desine Inc. (06-10)
Planning Commission
disposition of petition
A. Recommendation
regarding impact assessment. (05-24-06)
B. Disposition
regarding site plan. (05-24-06)
Petitioner present via Wayne Perry and James Barnwell, 2183
Pless Drive, Brighton, Michigan. Mr. Perry addresses the Planning
Commission, requesting to improve and expand the parking at Design, Inc.
They wish to move the loading dock to the back of the building and turn the
south and east sides into parking areas. They will improve the landscaping,
as well. James Mortensen inquires as to whether a precedent will be set if
they agree to expanded parking in a P.I.D. zone. Brian Borden indicates all
requirements are met. The requested spaces are 183% of the requirement.
Tesha Humphriss refers to the Tetra Tech letter of June 7th. She indicates
the Planning Commission must approve the slope of one of the hills. Tesha
indicates their plans are acceptable and adhere to the requirements.
Motion by
Barbara Figurski to recommend to the Township Board approval of the impact
assessment. Support by James Mortensen.
Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion by James
Mortensen to recommend to the Township Board approval of the site plan,
subject to:
1. The requirements
of the Brighton Area Fire Department, as spelled out in their letter of May
18th, 2006 will be complied with.
2. Parking of 44
spaces is acceptable.
3. There are no
outstanding engineering issues.
4. There will be no
outside storage or unlicensed vehicles being parked.
5. Dust control
measures will be added to the site plan.
Support by Dean
Tengle.
Motion carried
unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 5…Review of site plan
application, private road application and impact assessment for 40 acres
zoned Country Estates (CE) located on the west side of Kellogg Road, north
of McClements Road, Sec. 2, petitioned by Palace Construction. (06-13)
Planning Commission
disposition of petition
A. Recommendation of
impact assessment. (05-24-06)
B. Disposition of
private road site plan. (05-24-06)
Petitioner present via James Barnwell, 2183 Pless Drive,
Genoa Township for Palace Construction. Petitioner requests approval of a
proposed 1,000 foot long private road from which shared driveways will stem.
They request a private road changing into a shared driveway to minimize the
impact on the existing greenery. He has met with the Drain Commissioner’s
Office and they are all comfortable with the drainage capacity that would
exist. The property owners would pay for the maintenance of the private
road/drive by deed restriction since there’s no association, condominium
or plat. There is no master deed. The maintenance agreement would be
recorded per petitioner. The lots haven’t been sold or created at this
point. James Mortensen indicates the Township Attorney should review it. The
Fire Department has requested the driveway be 20’ wide, rather than 16’.
Petitioner agrees to do so. This exceeds the Township requirement.
Steve Morgan addresses the cul-de-sac and suggests that a
hammerhead or a “T” shape would be preferable to the Fire Department.
Petitioner acknowledges that and could change that.
Steve Morgan asks about the specs for gravel driveways.
Petitioner indicates he would follow the specifications. Steve Morgan
suggests that a letter from the engineer after the road is put in,
indicating what specifications were followed, should be a part of the
motion.
Tom Grostic, 6338 McClements Road addresses the Board in the
call to the public. There is cattle nearby at the family farm. The cattle
are contained by a fence.
Motion by
Barbara Figurski to recommend to the Township Board approval of the impact
assessment. Support by James Mortensen.
Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion by James
Mortensen to approve site plan for private road subject to:
1. The shared
driveway will be 20’ rather than 16’ in width.
2. A T-shape will be
used at the end of the shared driveway, rather than a cul-de-sac.
3. Desine
Engineering will furnish a letter to the Township, certifying that the
driveway is constructed per the construction plans.
4. The petitioner
will provide the road maintenance agreement to the Township for review and
approval.
5. The Township
Zoning Administrator may waive the requirement for a tree inventory.
6. The approval of
the Livingston County Drain Commission and Road Commission is required.
7. Dust control
measures will be added to the site plan.
Support by Barbara
Figurski.
Motion carried
unanimously.
Administrative Business:
Planners report presented by LSL Planners. No reports are
presented.
Approval of May 22, 2006 Planning Commission meeting
minutes. Upon motion of Barbara Figurski and support by Dean Tengle, the
minutes of May 22, 2006 were approved.
Member Discussion. The next meeting will be June 26th. Kelly
VanMarter reviews the proposed agenda items. James Mortensen indicates an
ordinance addressing the underground storage of water is needed at this
time. It should require that a statement be recorded regarding the
maintenance requirements. Steve Morgan indicates it should be a deed
restriction. Tesha Humphriss thinks it should be addressed in engineering
standards. Tesha Humphriss to prepare a proposal and submit it to the
Township Board. Steve Morgan suggests it should be a recordable document or
a development agreement, as well as an engineering standard. The Commmission
may consider a maintenance plan for above ground, as well.
At 9:08 p.m., meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Kristi Cox
Recording Secretary
|