|
Planning Commission Meeting
March 28, 2005
AGENDA OPEN
PUBLIC HEARING # 1…
Consideration of an amendment to Genoa Township Zoning Ordinance Article
11, General Provisions, Section 11.04.02, subsections (a) and (d) to
allow gazebos on decks with a maximum size of one hundred and fifty
(150) square feet and a maximum height of fourteen (14) feet. (05-17)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding zoning ordinance amendment.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 2… Review of revised site plan,
impact assessment and amendment to PUD agreement to change the
Northshore Bluffs from 8 to 4 lots, located in Sec. 21, petitioned by
Northshore Land Development. (05-11)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding PUD agreement amendment (fax dated
3/23/05).
B. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (dated 3/9/05).
C. Recommendation regarding revised site plan (dated 3/7/05).
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 3… Review of sketch plan and impact
assessment for a proposed glazed canopy for the Wal-Mart Garden Center
located at 3850 E. Grand River, Sec. 5, petitioned by Wal-Mart. (05-13)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (dated 3/8/05).
B. Disposition regarding sketch plan (dated 3/8/05).
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 4…
Review of sketch plan and impact assessment for a proposed 2,354 sq. ft.
addition for Waldecker Pontiac-Buick located at 7885 W. Grand River,
Sec. 13, petitioned by Waldecker Pontiac-Buick. (05-16)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (fax dated 2/17/05).
B. Disposition regarding sketch plan (dated 2/16/05).
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 5…
Review of final PUD site plan and impact assessment for a proposed
21,897 sq. ft. Tractor Supply Store with a 26,870 sq.ft. of outdoor
display located on northeast corner of E. Grand River and Lawson Drive,
Sec. 9, petitioned by Bunnell Hill Development Co., Inc. (05-14)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (dated 3/7/05).
B. Recommendation regarding final PUD site plan (dated 3/9/05).
WORK SESSION
MINUTES
The work session of the Planning Commission was
called to order by Chairman Don Pobuda at 6:30 p.m. The following
commission members were present constituting a quorum for transaction of
business: Don Pobuda, James Mortensen, Barbara Figurski, and Mark
Snyder. Also present was Kelly Kolakowski, Township Planner; Mike
Archinal, Township Manager; Jeff Purdy from Langworthy, Strader, LeBlanc
& Associates, Inc. and Tesha Humphriss from Tetra Tech, MPS.
By the end of the work session, there were a few persons in the
audience.
Items scheduled for action during the regular session
of the commission were discussed.
Mr. Archinal reviewed Agenda Item #1. He stated that
the current ordinance does not allow gazebos to be enclosed with screens
or glass. A condominium in the Oak Pointe Villas had this done and it
now blocks the neighbors’ view of the green. Due to this, he was asked
to do some research on how other communities handle gazebos and he could
not find any that speak to them specifically. He feels that they should
allow gazebos to be enclosed if they are attached to a deck and limit
their size to 150 square feet, which is approximately 13 feet in
diameter.
Commissioner Mortensen stated that currently the
Township allows much larger structures such as 30 x 30, 18 feet high
pole barns to be erected on properties.
Mr. Archinal stated that this issue was brought about
due to a condominium association. The zoning ordinance needs to address
the entire Township, and condominiums only make up a small portion of
the Township. He feels this is not a zoning issue and it should be
addressed in the condominium bi-laws and master deed.
Mr. Purdy agreed with Mr. Archinal’s comments.
PUBLIC HEARING
MINUTES
The regular session of the Planning Commission was
called to order by Chairman Don Pobuda at 7:08 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited and a moment of
silence was observed.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Mortensen, to
approve the Agenda as written.
The motion carried unanimously.
The call to the public was made to discuss items not
on the agenda. There was no response and the call to the public was
closed at 7:09 p.m. Chairman Pobuda noted that the Board will not begin
any new business after 10:00 p.m.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 1…
Consideration of an amendment to Genoa Township Zoning Ordinance Article
11, General Provisions, Section 11.04.02, subsections (a) and (d) to
allow gazebos on decks with a maximum size of one hundred and fifty
(150) square feet and a maximum height of fourteen (14) feet. (05-17)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding zoning ordinance amendment.
Ms. Kolakowski reiterated Mr. Archinal’s comments during the work
session. The proposal is to allow gazebos attached to decks to be
allowed to be enclosed; however, they can only be 150 square feet and 14
feet high.
The call to the public was made at 7:11 p.m.
Ms. Cil Buckner of 5310 Versailles is against the proposed change to
the ordinance. She would like the Township to consider enforcing the
ordinance that is in place now before changing it. A gazebo was built
next door to her home two years ago that has screens and windows and it
is against the ordinance. She is disappointed as a citizen and a
taxpayer that the ordinance was not adhered to.
Ms. Kolakowski is aware of Ms. Buckner’s situation and noted that Ms.
Buckner has been in contact with Supervisor McCririe and Mr. Archinal
and they are the ones who would be able to enforce the ordinance. The
Planning Commission has no discretion over this.
Commissioner Mortensen stated that the Township went through a series
of steps and researched and determined that currently the Township
allows much larger accessory structures that can be enclosed to be
built. There is not a practical way the Township can have a gazebo
ordinance other than what is being proposed. The homeowners association
and architectural control committees should be the ones who control this
issue with regard to condominium associations.
Chairman Pobuda agrees.
Mr. Purdy noted that this is a clean up of the ordinance. Currently,
if it is connected to the deck, it cannot be enclosed; however, if it is
not attached, then it can be as large as the property owner wants and
enclosed however they wish.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Snyder, to recommend to the
Township Board approval of the amendment to Genoa Township Zoning
Ordinance Article 11, General Provisions, Section 11.04.02, subsections
(a) and (d) to allow gazebos on decks with a maximum size of one hundred
and fifty (150) square feet and a maximum height of fourteen (14) feet
as reviewed by the Township this evening. The motion carried
unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 2… Review of revised site plan,
impact assessment and amendment to PUD agreement to change the
Northshore Bluffs from 8 to 4 lots, located in Sec. 21, petitioned by
Northshore Land Development. (05-11)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
- Recommendation regarding PUD agreement amendment (fax dated
3/23/05).
- Recommendation regarding impact assessment (dated 3/9/05).
- Recommendation regarding revised site plan (dated 3/7/05).
Mr. Jeff Montpas of Boss Engineering and representing Northshore Land
Development was present.
They wish to request a reduction in the density for the Northshore
Bluff section from eight smaller units to four larger units. He noted
that the road is already installed.
Chairman Pobuda questioned the easement that leads to the small
island. Mr. Montpas stated the island is not included in the PUD
Agreement and the easement is not part of this subdivision.
Chairman Pobuda stated the Township would like to see the island made
a conservation easement and always remain a natural wetland. Mr. Montpas
stated he cannot address that request; however, he can ask that question
of the applicant. He noted that if it was requested to be developed,
they would need to come before the Planning Commission for approval.
Mr. Purdy stated that the request complies with the ordinance
requirements, although he wants to ensure the revised PUD notes that the
other four units will not be transferred to another part of the
development and that this is, in fact, a reduction in density.
Mr. Monpas does not feel the applicant is planning to move the other
four units as there is no room to develop more parcels.
Ms. Humphriss noted the petitioner has addressed all of her concerns.
The call to the public was made at 7:25 p.m. with no response.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Snyder, to recommend to the
Township Board approval of the PUD Amendment with a Township received
date of March 23, 2003 for Northshore Bluffs with the following
conditions:
-
The amendment be reviewed
by the Township Attorney with specific reference to language to assure
that the four unit reduction in the PUD is not simply a transfer of
them to another part of the PUD and is, in fact, an overall reduction
of PUD units.
-
The Township Attorney
review the easements and other related documents to the island to see
if there is a way the Township can legally be assured that no
development take place on said island.
The motion carried
unanimously.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Snyder to recommend to the
Township Board approval of the Impact Assessment dated October 2004 for
Northshore Bluffs with the following conditions:
- Dust control measures shall be added.
- Item #B should be changed from “8” units to “4”.
The motion carried unanimously.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Snyder, to recommend to the
Township Board approval of the Site Plan dated March 7, 2005 to change
the Northshore Bluffs from 8 to 4 lots, located in Sec. 21, petitioned
by Northshore Land Development with the following condition:
- Dust control measures shall be added.
The motion carried unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 3… Review of sketch plan and impact
assessment for a proposed glazed canopy for the Wal-Mart Garden Center
located at 3850 E. Grand River, Sec. 5, petitioned by Wal-Mart. (05-13)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (dated 3/8/05).
B. Disposition regarding sketch plan (dated 3/8/05).
Ms. Kolakowski advised that there are currently no site violations
with the petitioner; however, there is a propane distribution tank cage
outside the front of the store that needs to be removed.
Mr. Ronald Reese of John R. Roberts Architect representing Wal-Mart
was present.
He showed colored renderings of what the proposed canopy will look
like. He also showed samples of building materials. The canopy’s purpose
is to provide shelter and protection from the elements. There are two
peaks and the sides roll up and down depending on the weather.
Commissioner Mortensen questioned where it is being placed in the
garden center. Mr. Reese showed the location on the Wal-Mart site plan.
It will be inside the brick and iron gates currently at the store. It
will be approximately 24 feet from the fence inside the current garden
center and will be approximately 9 feet above the tip of the decorative
fence at the highest peak.
Chairman Pobuda questioned the durability of this type of material,
especially in cold states such as Michigan. Mr. Reese stated materials
do get worn, but these materials are the best of their type and if
maintenance is required, it will be done.
Mr. Purdy stated they have no issues with the proposal and the only
requirement is the Planning Commission’s approval of the materials.
Chairman Pobuda noted that the propane exchange tank storage area
needs to be removed as it is not in compliance with the current
agreement.
Ms. Humphriss reviewed her letter of February 24, 2004.
The petitioner needs to clarify on the plans where drainage from
the area of the proposed canopy currently goes as they are proposing
to direct the draining from the canopy into an existing 10-inch storm
drain.
With regard to trench details, the petitioner needs to provide a
minimum of 3-inches of bedding below the pipe and the granular
material directly below the concrete should be specified as MDOT Class
III material compacted to 95%.
The petitioner will comply with both of these requests.
The call to the public was made at 7:40 p.m. with no response.
Commissioner Figurski noted to the petitioner that currently there
are large folded boxes in the front and rear of the site and there are
also three large semi trucks parked there. All of this needs to be
removed. Mr. Reese will follow up with Wal-Mart regarding these issues.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Snyder, to recommend to the
Township Board approval of the Impact Assessment dated March 8, 2005 for
a proposed glazed canopy for the Wal-Mart Garden Center located at 3850
E. Grand River, Sec. 5, petitioned by Wal-Mart. The motion carried
unanimously.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Snyder, to approve the Site Plan
dated March 3, 2005 for a proposed glazed canopy for the Wal-Mart Garden
Center located at 3850 E. Grand River, Sec. 5, petitioned by Wal-Mart
with the following conditions:
- Prior to presentation to the Township Board, Wal-Mart will come in
compliance with the PUD Agreement in the following ways:
- The propane supply cage will be removed
- The semi’s that are currently parked in the lot will be removed
- The folded boxes on the site shall be eliminated.
- Building materials reviewed this evening are acceptable and will
become the property of the Township.
- Items #3 and 4 from the Township Engineer’s letter dated February
25, 2005 shall be complied with.
The motion carried unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 4…
Review of sketch plan and impact assessment for a proposed 2,354 sq. ft.
addition for Waldecker Pontiac-Buick located at 7885 W. Grand River,
Sec. 13, petitioned by Waldecker Pontiac-Buick. (05-16)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (fax dated 2/17/05).
B. Disposition regarding sketch plan (dated 2/16/05).
Mr. Stan Schaefer, the builder, and Mr. Jerry Waldecker, the business
owner, were present.
Mr. Schaefer stated they are proposing to add a 2,354 square foot
addition to the write up alley of the dealership. It will give more room
for the service advisors to discuss issues with the customers. They will
also be adding a waiting area. They will be using the same materials
that are currently on the building. He showed elevation drawings.
Mr. Waldecker added this is for the purpose of customer service as
well as safety. They are planning to move the customer consulting area
with the service technicians away from the mechanical area.
Mr. Purdy reviewed his letter of February 22, 2005.
Planning Commission approval is required for the proposed
architecture, materials and colors.
Parking calculations are not provided, although he is sure they
have sufficient parking as this is a car dealership.
All lighting, existing and new, needs to be downward directed,
full cutoff, metal halide fixtures. Mr. Waldecker stated all of their
lights currently comply and they are not planning on adding any more.
Chairman Pobuda questioned the new strobe lights that have been added
to the security system. Mr. Waldecker stated that was required by his
insurance company. The other option was invisible fencing that would
announce if someone was penetrating the property after hours. He chose
the strobe lights. Chairman Pobuda asked if the frequency of the strobe
could be reduced. Mr. Waldecker is not sure, however, he will contact
the manufacturer and advise the Township.
Commissioner Figurski stated that the dumpster fencing needs to be
repaired. Mr. Purdy added that it is required to be block to match the
building. The Planning Commission can allow wood; however, that is only
done in industrial areas where it is not seen. Mr. Waldecker stated he
will replace the dumpster enclosure.
Commissioner Figurski noted the fire department noted concerns in the
March 8th letter. Mr. Waldecker advised that their concerns will be
addressed.
Ms. Humphriss stated that the petitioner has addressed all of her
previous concerns.
The call to the public was made at 7:59 p.m. with no response.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Snyder, to recommend to the
Township Board approval of the Impact Assessment dated February 17, 2005
for a proposed 2,354 sq. ft. addition for Waldecker Pontiac-Buick
located at 7885 W. Grand River. The motion carried unanimously.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Snyder, to approve the Site Plan
dated March 23, 2005 for a proposed 2,354 sq. ft. addition for Waldecker
Pontiac-Buick located at 7885 W. Grand River with the following
conditions:
- Materials and colors of addition will match the existing building.
- Two trees and five shrubs will be added to the entrance of the
site.
- The petitioner will investigate whether there is some way to
mitigate the strobe light on the security system.
- The dumpster enclosure will be constructed of masonry.
- Requirements in the Brighton Area Fire Department’s letter dated
March 8, 2005 shall be complied with.
- Items 6 and 7 from TTMPS’s letter dated February 28, 2005 will be
complied with.
- Dust control measures will be added.
The motion carried unanimously.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 5…
Review of final PUD site plan and impact assessment for a proposed
21,897 sq. ft. Tractor Supply Store with a 26,870 sq.ft. of outdoor
display located on northeast corner of E. Grand River and Lawson Drive,
Sec. 9, petitioned by Bunnell Hill Development Co., Inc. (05-14)
Planning Commission disposition of petition.
A. Recommendation regarding impact assessment (dated 3/7/05).
B. Recommendation regarding final PUD site plan (dated 3/9/05).
Mr. John Ketler of Ketler Real Estate, representing Tractor Supply,
Mr. Larry Simms of Bunnell Hill Development, Mr. Doug Gardner of SSOE
Engineering, and Mr. Harvey Weiss, the property owner, were present.
Mr. Weiss stated he will retain ownership of the building. He will be
here to answer any questions but will leave the presentation to the
other gentlemen.
Mr. John Ketler stated that Tractor Supply has had a lot of growth
and has outgrown their current facility. This proposal will
significantly improve the outdoor storage issues that Tractor Supply has
had with Genoa Township.
Mr. Larry Simms showed colored site plan and colored building
renderings. To assist with the screening of the building and outdoor
sales, they have added significant landscaping. They have added screen
walls to the front outdoor display and a 12-foot high ornamental fence
on the front and then a chain link fence on the east and north sides of
the building. The building is high on the site and will be approximately
nine feet above Grand River.
Mr. Gardner stated they are proposing an access drive off of Grand
River as well as adding landscaping along the detention pond. The fence
and brick in the front of the outdoor sales area is five feet and they
will not have any items in that area that will be higher than that.
Commissioner Mortensen stated that the decorative fence will also
need to be on the east side of the display area as this abuts
residential property.
Chairman Pobuda asked Mr. Weiss if he had a full site plan to display
this evening as is required by the PUD Agreement. Mr. Weiss showed a
conceptual plan this evening; however, they cannot be certain how the
site will develop.
Commissioner Mortensen noted that the Township engineer suggests an
update to the traffic study. Mr. Weiss agrees that some traffic work
should be done, which would be in the best interest of him, the
Township, as well as other businesses in the area. Ms. Humphriss noted
that another curb cut on Grand River is going to require MDOT approval
and they will most likely require a traffic study.
Chairman Pobuda stated that 25% of the site is to remain open space.
He asked Mr. Weiss if that is being depicted on the site plan shown this
evening. He wants to ensure that it is going to be accomplished. Mr.
Weiss ensured the Planning Commission that they will maintain 25% of the
site as open space.
Chairman Pobuda noted that a 20-foot greenbelt is required along each
property line. Mr. Simms stated there is a 50-foot wide greenbelt on the
east side of the property. Mr. Weiss stated that the 20-foot greenbelt
will be provided for the rest of the site as it is developed. It will
remain natural until it is developed.
Chairman Pobuda questioned the required sidewalks. Mr. Gardner stated
they will be installing the sidewalk along Grand River and Lawson Drive
at the time of this development.
Chairman Pobuda stated that the PUD Agreement states that no cyclone
fencing will be allowed on the property and it is being proposed for the
outdoor display area. Commissioner Mortensen stated he would want the
ornamental fencing and brick on the east and south sides and would
permit the cycle fencing with the shielding strips and some additional
landscaping to the north as that is industrial property. Mr. Purdy
suggested wood fencing to the east instead of the ornamental fencing as
it has a more residential feel. Commissioner Mortensen would not want
the wood as it deteriorates. Mr. Weiss would prefer the cyclone fencing
with the slots on the east property line. He feels it will give a better
screen to the residents. Chairman Pobuda would like the decorative
fencing and Commissioners Figurski, Mortensen, and Snyder agree.
Chairman Pobuda suggested landscaping be added to the north property
line to shield the adjoining industrial site to the rear of this site.
Mr. Weiss stated he will add additional landscaping on the north side.
A five-minute break was held at 9:03 p.m.
Mr. Purdy reviewed his letter of March 24, 2005.
They recommend that the outdoor display area west of the store
entrance be removed as it is in a prominent location as you drive into
the site and could contribute to visual clutter. Commissioner
Mortensen stated that none of the items will be higher than the fence
so they will be screened.
The Planning Commission must approve all building materials,
architecture, and colors. The petitioner did not present sample
building materials this evening.
The proposed development requires 130 parking spaces; however, the
petitioner is proposing 92 spaces, which the petitioner feels is
sufficient. All commissioners agree to allow the 92 spaces and it
should be noted in the PUD Agreement.
The westerly parking spaces will interfere with traffic
circulation along the access drive. Mr. Purdy feels this could become
a major service drive when the remainder of the site is developed and
they do not want cars backing out of parking spaces onto a main
driveway. After a brief discussion, all commissioners agreed that
these parking spaces need to be removed.
The entrance from Lawson Drive does not meet the driveway
separation standard with Whitehorse Drive.
A shared access easement needs to be provided on the plans for the
commercial properties to the southeast.
The landscape plan is deficient for buffer zone and detention pond
plantings.
Additional detail is needed for the light fixtures.
The lighting exceeds the maximum site lighting intensity and will
impact adjacent residential properties.
Ms. Humphriss reviewed her letter of March 24, 2005.
They have some minor general clean-up issues that need to be
addressed; however, they are still numerous (22 total) major drainage
and grading, traffic, and utility issues outstanding.
Due to the many outstanding engineering issues, planning issues, and
the fact that there were no building materials presented, it was
suggested that this item be tabled.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Figurski, to
table Agenda Item #5 at the petitioner’s request. The motion carried
unanimously.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Mortensen, to
approve the minutes of March 14, 2005 with minor revisions. The
motion carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:43 p.m.
Submitted by: Patty Thomas, Recording Secretary
Approved by: Barbara Figurski, Secretary
|