|
August 25, 2003
7:00 p.m.
AGENDA
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING #
1…Review of special use application, site plan, and environmental impact
assessment for proposed 3000 sq. ft. addition to existing structure and
a new 11,958 sq. ft. building with (4)-lease spaces located at 7208 W.
Grand River, involving outdoor commercial display, sales and storage,
petitioned by Conely Engines, (John Conely). (PC 03-20).
Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation regarding special use application.
B. Recommendation regarding impact assessment.
C. Recommendation regarding site plan.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 2…Review of special use application, site plan,
and environmental impact assessment for proposed Cedar Closet Storage
facility with (1) self storage and offices building with managers
residence and (3) additional self storage buildings with exterior
access, located on the south side of Grand River Ave. between Dorr and
Gray Roads, Section 10, petitioned by
Joseph A. Guido, Guido Associates Inc. (PC 03-21).
Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation regarding special use application.
B. Recommendation regarding impact assessment.
C. Recommendation regarding site plan.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 3…Review of site plan application, and site plan
for proposed amendment to the Jay’s Marketplace site plan for a Murray’s
Discount Auto Store located at the southeast corner of Grand River Ave,
4030 West Grand River, Section 4, petitioned by Anthony Patric
Inc./Hicks Family Limited Partnership. (PC 03-22).
Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Disposition regarding amendment to site plan.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING # 4…The Township is proposing to amend the Master
Plan Future Land Use Map. The area being considered for amendment is
located in Sections 33 and 34 in the southern portion of the Township
along the east side of Chilson Road, south of Brighton Road. The
amendment is intended to extend the water and sewer service area into
these sections and provide for residential densities at 2-4 dwellings
per acre.
Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation regarding Master Plan Amendment.
MINUTES
The work session of the Planning Commission was called to order by
Chairman Don Pobuda at 6:30 p.m. The following commission members were
present constituting a quorum for transaction of business: Don Pobuda,
Barbara Figurski, James Mortensen, Ken Burchfield, Curt Brown, and Bill
Litogot. Also present was Kelly Kolakowski, Township Planner; Ron
Nesbitt from Langworthy, Strader, LeBlanc & Associates, Inc. and Debra
Huntley from Tetra Tech, MPS. By the end of the work session, there were
a few persons in the audience.
Items scheduled for action during the regular session of the commission
were discussed.
The regular session of the Planning Commission was called to order by
Chairman Don Pobuda at 7:02 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited and a moment of silence was
observed.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Litogot, to approve the Agenda as
written.
The motion carried unanimously.
The call to the public was made to discuss items not on the agenda.
There was no response and the call to the public was closed at 7:03 p.m.
Chairman Pobuda noted that the Board will not begin any new business
after 10:00 p.m.
Open Public Hearing #1… Review of special use application, site plan,
and environmental impact assessment for proposed 3,000 sq. ft. addition
to existing structure and a new 11,958 sq. ft. building with four lease
spaces located at 7208 W. Grand River, involving outdoor commercial
display, sales, and storage, petitioned by Conely Engines (John Conely).
(PC 03-20).
· Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation regarding special use application.
B. Recommendation regarding impact assessment.
C. Recommendation regarding site plan.
Mr. Christopher Grzenkowicz and Dennis Kirkwood from Desine
Engineering were present to represent the petitioner.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised the site is an existing automotive rental and
repair facility on the south side of Grand River. They are proposing a
3,000 square foot addition to the building for needed storage as well as
a 11,958 square foot building that will house four lease spaces. They
have received Livingston County Road Commission approval for the
expansion of the entrance.
They are proposing 109 parking spaces, 45 for automotive sales display,
10 for rental car parking, and three will be on a raised automotive
display pod. The sign will be on the raised pod and there will be
landscaping and low level lighting.
They will install a 50-foot greenbelt on the Grand River frontage and a
20-foot greenbelt on the west property line. They will be preserving all
existing vegetation on the south side of the site.
Mr. Kirkwood showed colored elevations and showed sample building
materials. The addition and new building will match the current building
materials.
Commissioner Litogot asked if the pod lighting will be for the sign or
the cars. Mr. Grzenkowicz advised it will be for both. There will be low
wattage and will be on from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
The call to the public was made at 7:12 p.m.
Mr. Bill Ross of 2603 Hewlett Road owns the property to the south. He is
concerned about the buffer on the south side. He feels that four canopy
trees aren’t going to be sufficient to block his residence. He is
currently zoned agricultural and farms the land; however, he will
eventually want to put homes back there as the Township is trying to
rezone him to large country estates. He had the following concerns:
- Is the existing storm drain from Grand River being eliminated? He
feels it needs to be improved.
- Are the rear doors of the building going to be closed or open? He
questioned the noise as well as lighting.
- Are the setbacks for building next to a body of water being met?
- Is the back going to be curbed so that any snow removal chemicals
won’t be put into the pond? He is concerned about saving the pond.
- Will fencing be installed at the back of the property to deter
trespassing?
Ms. Jeanne Rymarz of 7086 Lindsey lives on the west side of the
property, along with seven other residents. This is a beautiful
neighborhood. This is going to decrease their property values. She wants
all of the trees to remain. The site currently looks like a used car
lot. She noted this has been before the Township before and Mr. Conely
did not make the improvements to the site that he was required to do.
Ms. Nancy Brown of 7121 Lindsey stated her home sits next to the “mess”
that is currently there. She can see it from her windows. There are
non-running cars, trucks, garbage, and motor homes. She agrees with her
neighbor that Mr. Conely has not done what he was required to do. She
feels the Township needs to think about the people in the area. This
site is too small for what he wants to do.
Mr. Mike Young of 7118 Lindsey lives across the street from Ms. Brown
and he has the same concerns. He wants to make sure there is no access
to that property from Lindsey Drive. He would like to see a fence and
evergreens to block the view. He is concerned about the lighting and
late-night activity.
Mr. Douglas Sams of 7089 Lindsey lives next to Ms. Brown. He would like
to protect the privacy of the cul-de-sac. They are all good neighbors
and do not feel that Mr. Conely is a good neighbor. There are vehicles
parked on the grass, which is against Genoa Township ordinance. If Mr.
Conely has been unable to comply with the terms of his site plan and how
can they be sure that he will do what is requested this time.
Ms. Marge Patterson of 7054 Lindsey is concerned about noise. They do
not want that building there or access to this site from Lindsey Drive.
Mr. Sams asked if the Grand River access will be shored by any other
businesses.
The call to the public was closed at 7:29. Chairman Pobuda advised that
the Commission can table this item and review the conditions that Mr.
Conely has violated or continue. Commissioner Litogot feels the public
is entitled to answers to their questions.
Commissioner Mortensen advised the public that this property is zoned
industrial and it is always a problem with industrial zoning is next to
residential zoning. The owner of an industrial property can put a lot of
things on there that are not very desirable but are within the
ordinance.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised they will line the south side of the site with
evergreens and all of the existing vegetation along the waterfront will
remain. They can change the canopy trees to evergreens with the Planning
Commission desires. They will add a row of 17 evergreen trees on the
west side of the detention pond. They are also adding a four-foot high
landscape berm along the west property line with approximately 80 trees
and shrubs, which is greater than the requirement.
Mr. Nesbitt advised that since this is a Special Land Use, the Planning
Commission can require additional landscaping as well as require the
existing vegetation be designated as a conservation easement. He agreed
that the landscaping to the west is meeting the ordinance, however,
minimum height of the plantings can be stipulated.
Ms. Huntley advised the existing pipe from Grand River will continue to
serve the area. There is adequate room to serve the storm drainage in
the area and it meets the Livingston County Drain Commission
requirements.
Mr. Kirkwood advised the question regarding the rear doors cannot be
answered at this time, as the occupants have not yet been determined.
Chairman Pobuda noted that this is another reason to have adequate
screening on the rear of the lot.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised the lighting will be building mounted, shielded,
downward directed and will only be on from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and
after that time, the lighting will only be for security purposes. Mr.
Nesbitt is satisfied with the proposed lighting.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised that the water setbacks are 25 – 50 feet and
they are will beyond that, they are 250 – 300 feet away. The curbing in
the rear will be 6” high. Mr. Nesbitt advised this is standard for Genoa
Township. He does not feel the snow plowing will be an issue for the
pond. When snow is plowed it will be pushed toward the catch basins. He
noted that the pond is 250 – 300 feet away from the parking lot.
With regard to the rear lot fencing, Mr. Nesbitt would like to see
something attractive as opposed to a silver chain link fence. Mr.
Grzenkowicz does not feel the fencing would accomplish what Mr. Ross is
concerned with. They do not feel it is Mr. Conely’s responsibility to
stop trespassers.
Mr. Grzenkowicz stated the driveway off of Grand River will be extended
to provide access to the new building. They have no intention of
accessing the property from Lindsey Drive.
Chairman Pobuda asked the petitioner about Mr. Conely’s not complying
with the requirements of the original site plan. Mr. Grzenkowicz advised
he cannot speak for Mr. Conely. His firm was hired to put together a
plan to help them clean up the yard and make it a more visually
appealing site. If he wants to have tenants on the site, then he is
going to have to clean up the site and keep it clean.
With regard to the noise, Mr. Grzenkowicz advised this is an existing
use and the noise will not change. What they are interested in putting
in the additional building will not produce more noise.
Chairman Pobuda is concerned about Mr. Conely not being a good neighbor.
He noted that the Township has addressed these issues before and Mr.
Conely has not complied.
Mr. Nesbitt reviewed his letter of August 7, 2003.
He reviewed the requirements of Special Land Use approval.
He suggested specific conditions of no storage of inoperable vehicles
and all vehicles are parked on paved services.
Commissioner Mortensen questioned Item D in Rob’s letter. How will the
future tenants address the issue of hazardous material usage and
storage? Mr. Grzenkowicz stated they have done a PIPP and will require
each tenant to submit one if needed. They believe that other automotive
related businesses will rent this space (i.e. car stereo company, etc.).
Commissioner Mortensen would like to have that be a condition of the
motion if it was to move forward this evening. Mr. Nesbitt agrees.
Mr. Nesbitt continued. Any rooftop equipment must be screened from view
on all sides, the Township should be provided with copies of the
easements for the property to the west as well as providing access to
the proposed addition, and the parking spaces are sufficient. Chairman
Pobuda questioned there being any parking in the front of the site. Mr.
Grzenkowicz advised they will not have any cars parked on the grass and
will move them to the parking space as well as on the elevated pod.
Commissioner Litogot stated Mr. Conely was not to sell cars on this site
as part of the original approval. There was a brief discussion regarding
parking being allowed in the front of the site and what will be parked
there. Mr. Grzenkowicz advised there will be cars for sale as well as
cars to rent. Commissioner Mortensen asked about car hoods being up with
signage. Mr. Kolakowski advised that temporary signs are prohibited by
ordinance. Commissioners Mortensen, Figurski and Litogot will allow the
car hoods to be open. Commissioner Burchfield feels this is a micro
issue. These conditions were put on before and were not met. How can the
Township be sure they will be met now. Commissioner Brown agrees.
Ms. Huntley advised they addressed most of the issues in her July 29,
2003 letter. Genoa Township requires lawn grades to be 1 on 4 and there
are two areas where it is not met. Mr. Grzenkowicz advised the southeast
part of the site just south of parking lot and wrapping around the
parking lot was 1 on 3, however, they have revised their plan to
accommodate the 1 on 4 slope. They did not change the slope on the east
side of the site to preserve as much vegetation as possible. If they
were to meet the 1 on 4 slope requirement, they would have to cut 20
feet into the current vegetation. They will put so in this area to
ensure no erosion. Ms. Huntley advised that as long as soil
stabilization is provided, they would not be a problem with this. All
commissioners agree.
Moved by Burchfield, seconded Litogot, by to recommend rejection of the
special land use application due to the following reasons:
1. Historical non-compliance with Township regulations and ordinances
regarding current and continued uses of the property.
2. Inability of the Township to regulate uses of the 12,000 square foot
building proposed on the south portion of the property.
3. This does not meet special land use application consideration. It is
the opinion of the motion maker that this is a commercial strip mall
proposal for an industrial site without appropriate conditions to meet
the general commercial zoning requirements.
4. This motion maker believes that the lack of knowledge as to the
tenants, but the candid admissions by the petitioner that the four will
be for automotive related and other similar uses indicates that this
petitioner needs to consider a petition to rezone to General Commercial
as opposed to the requested Special Land Use.
Commissioner Mortensen feels that this item should be tabled to allow
the petitioner and Planning Commission to gather more information
instead of recommending rejection. He will vote against the denial.
Mr. Grzenkowicz requested to be tabled to meet with staff and discuss
the outstanding issues.
Commissioner Burchfield removed his motion from the table and
Commissioner Litogot seconded.
Moved by Mortensen, seconded by Litogot, to table Agenda Item #1 at the
petitioner’s request. The motion carried unanimously.
Open Public Hearing #2… Review of site plan application and site plan
for proposed amendment to the Jay’s Marketplace site plan for a Murray’s
Discount Auto Store located at the southeast corner of Grand River
Avenue, 4030 W. Grand River, Section 4, petitioned by Anthony Patric
Inc. / Hicks Family Limited Partnership. (PC 03-22).
· Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Disposition regarding amendment to site plan.
Mr. Patric Manor, CEO of Anthony-Patric, Inc., Mr. David McDade,
architect, John Hicks, property owner, and Miles Gatlin, a Murray’s
representative, were present to represent the petitioner.
Mr. Manor advised they have redesigned the front elevation from what was
approved previously. He showed colored elevations. The easements are in
process right now with Consumers Energy as well as Country Corners. They
originally requested three overhead doors on the rear elevation,
however, only one door is required now. They are proposing to upgrade
the door to give it a more aesthetic appearance, such as a wood stained
door. They will also replace the pole sign with a monument sign.
Commissioner Mortensen asked if the door could be screened. Mr. Manor
advised the door is currently screened with heavy landscaping.
Mr. McDade advised all of the planner’s issues have been addressed on
the new site plan. With regard to the drainage, the impervious area has
been decreased from what was originally approved and do not feel this is
an issue. Ms. Huntley agreed this was true; however, the storm sewer
calculations need to be provided, not the detention pond calculations,
to prevent flooding into the parking lot.
The call to the public was made at 8:35 p.m. with no response.
Chairman Pobuda asked if there has been a marketing study to show this
is the correct site for this store. Mr. Gatlin advised they have a
fairly standard approach to approving a site, such as traffic counts,
demographics, number of homes, vehicles, vehicles per family, etc. This
site was approved on this basis.
Mr. Nesbitt advised the petitioner has met all of their requirements.
Ms. Huntley advised the petitioner has met all of their concerns,
however, reiterated that the storm sewer calculations need to be redone.
Chairman Pobuda would like to have the stipulation that no car
maintenance be conducted in the parking lot. Mr. Gatlin advised they put
signs up and their managers “police” the parking lot.
It was also noted that there will be no outdoor displays or window signs
or banners. Mr. Manor stated these items are addressed in the lease. He
has worked with Murray's in the past and was always impressed with the
outcome.
Commissioner Litogot asked if the awnings are lit up from underneath.
Mr. Manor advised they are canvas awnings and will not be illuminated.
Moved by Burchfield, seconded by Mortensen, to approve the site plan
amendment dated July 17, 2003 for Jay’s Marketplace to a Murray’s
Discount Auto Store located at the southeast corner of Grand River
Avenue, 4030 W. Grand River, Section 4, petitioned by Anthony Patric
Inc. / Hicks Family Limited Partnership with the following conditions:
1. Colored rendering as provided by the petitioner, specifically of the
west elevation, of the Murray’s Discount Auto store are approved.
2. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened by the
parapet roof.
3. The material used in the construction shall be as previously
approved.
4. Before issuance of any land use permit, the petitioner shall provide
a copy of the recorded access easement to the property to the east and
subject to Township Attorney approval.
5. Prior to placement and construction, administrative approval of the
monument sign, which is approved as a substitute for the previously
proposed pole sign.
6. Requirement of dumpster dimensions as noted in the Township
Engineer’s letter of August 20, 2003.
7. The petitioner shall provide storm sewer calculations.
8. The Township Engineer shall determine the applicable water and sewer
fees.
9. There shall be no outside display of merchandise nor shall additional
signs be permitted without prior Township approval.
10. Outside audio speakers are prohibited.
The motion carried unanimously.
Open Public Hearing #3… Review of special use application, site plan,
and environmental impact assessment for proposed Cedar Closet Storage
facility with one self storage and offices building with managers
residence and three additional self storage buildings with exterior
access, located on the south side of Grand River Avenue, between Dorr
and Gray Roads, Section 10, petitioned by Joseph A. Guido, Guido
Associates, Inc. (PC 03-21).
· Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation regarding special use application.
B. Recommendation regarding impact assessment.
C. Recommendation regarding site plan.
Mr. Christopher Grzenkowicz, of Desine Engineering, and Mr. Joe
Guido were present to represent the petitioner.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised they are proposing a self-storage facility on
Grand River east of Gray Road and west of Lakepointe Manor. They will be
constructing four buildings. Three 10,000 square foot storage buildings
and one building with an office, climate control storage units, and a
residence for the manager. The access will be from Grand River.
A six-foot high wall is being proposed to screen from the residential
property to the west. They are also proposing a six-foot high fence on
the south side of the property for security reasons. They are requesting
a Special Land Use because of the size of the buildings.
Mr. Guido advised all buildings will be one story. He showed colored
elevations and sample building materials. The building will be masonry
block with standing seam metal roof and doors. The doors will not face
the residences. They are proposing a decorative fence for the north side
and part of the east and west side of the site. This is a low-impact
business, with approximately 20 to 30 trips her day. The lighting is
wall mounted, will be placed 60 feet apart, and will be contained
between the buildings. There will be lighting on the ends of the
buildings, but that will be for security reasons only.
The call to the public was made at 9:10 p.m.
Shannon and Tom VanSach of 1791 Grey Road live directly beside the
buildings. They do not feel that the six-foot wall is adequate. They
would like a higher berm, approximately 25 feet, and would like it to
extend the length of the buildings with evergreen trees every 12 feet.
If fencing is proposed, they would like it to be on the east side of the
berm. They would like the access drive from Grand River be on the other
side (east) of the property. They would like to see all of the existing
vegetation left on the site as there are very old trees there. She asked
where the dumpsters will be placed.
Mr. Tom Beebe of 1875 Grey Road asked how the detention pond is going to
be built, how far is it going to be from the property line, and is it
regulated. He would also like the driveway moved to the east side of the
property. He asked about the hours of operation.
Ms. Tamra Howe of 1847 Grey Road is concerned about the retention pond.
Will there be fencing? Is it regulated? She asked what types of items
will be stored in the units. Will there be vehicles that leak fluid? Is
there any outside storage?
Mr. William Friend of 1829 Grey Road owns the lowest lot on Grey Road is
concerned if the water is going to drain onto his property.
Mr. William Howe of 1387 Gray Road stated he is not against this, but
wants to make sure it is done properly. He is concerned about the
draining. When the water in this area does not flow, it ends up in his
basement. He asked if the retention pond is regulated.
Mr. Kenneth Patterson of 20114 Woodhill in Northville owns the first
three lots on Grey Road. He questioned the proposed retention pond on
Grand River.
The call to the public was closed at 9:20 p.m.
Mr. Guido advised the business hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on
weekdays and until 4:00 p.m. on weekends. Certain users need to have
access at off-hours and would be able to access the site.
Chairman Pobuda asked about outside speakers. There is an audible signal
to alert the manager of trespassers.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised they will need to clear 30 feet of the
vegetation on the east side to building and maintain the retention pond.
It is a dry pond and is designed per the Livingston County Drain
Commissioner’s requirements. The pond is 30 feet from the south and east
and 60 feet from the west residential lot lines. Ms. Huntley advised
this pond will be taking some of the draining off site, which will help
the residents with their current drainage problems. She added that the
Livingston County Drain Commissioner will answer any questions regarding
West Nile virus, but noted that because these are dry ponds, they will
not propagate West Nile virus. The pond on the north side of the site
will also help the residents’ drainage. She added that they are not
required to be fenced due to the slope based on the Livingston County
Drain Commission. Chairman Pobuda advised the pond area will need to be
manicured and not left natural. The petitioner will comply.
Mr. Grzenkowicz advised that any runoff that would normally run to Lot
#38 will be drained into the storm sewer under the developed part of the
site thus helping the residence on Lot #38.
Chairman Pobuda asked the petitioner about moving the access road to the
east. Mr. Grzenkowicz advised that if the driveway is moved to the east,
then the building, dumpster, utilities, etc. could be moved closer to
the residential area and would still require only the 20-foot buffer.
Mr. Nesbitt noted that if the driveway is kept on the west, it will be
the driveway for both the storage area and the future commercial
development. Mr. Guido reiterated Mr. Grzenkowicz’s points regarding
having the building, loading dock, utilities, and dumpster on the future
site being built more toward the Lakepointe site and not the residential
area. Commissioner Mortensen noted that this project needs variances and
he does not like an industrial site next to a residential area to have
variances for setbacks. He would like the drive on the east side. All
commissioners agree.
Chairman Pobuda questioned what items would be stored and how would
hazardous materials be handled. Mr. Guido advised people typically store
household goods. Hazardous materials are not allowed and if any spilled,
he would be in violation and it would be cleaned up as best as it could.
He advised there is a list from the fire department of hazardous
materials that cannot be stored and any vehicle that is stored can only
have ¼ of a tank of gas or less. He can provide the Township with a
sample contract that he has with his other rental units.
Mr. Nesbitt reviewed his letter of August 19, 2003. He noted that in
Section 3.11 of the Ordinance, it states that any dwelling outside of a
residential or agricultural zoning area needs to be approved by the ZBA.
This would be the case with the living area for the manager on site.
With regard to the screening on the west side between the industrial and
residential, they suggest this buffer be widened to 50 feet from
beginning to end to mitigate potential impacts to adjacent residences.
Mr. Grzenkowicz noted their plan has met the requirements of the
ordinance; however, if additional trees are required, that can be
complied with. He feels the wall would provide more screening and they
could plant evergreen trees in addition to the wall.
Commissioner Burchfield stated his concerns. He would like a PIPP to
ensure there are clean up materials on site to aid in case of a spill,
the impact assessment should be revised to add the hours of operation,
the percentage of 24-hour-a-day users, time lighting, a manufacturer’s
cut sheet of lighting fixtures shall be included, sample masonry
material should be presented, and he would like to see a lot of
landscaping in addition to the wall on the west where it abuts
residential zoning.
Commissioner Litogot noted that Wonderland Marine had to take out their
outside alarm and one will not be allowed at this site. He agrees with
Commissioner Burchfield with regard to the lighting plan and
manufacturer’s cut sheets being required.
Commissioner Mortensen would like to see the screening of the east side
of the site as well. He does not want to see a chain link fence.
The applicant asked to be tabled this evening. Moved by Figurski,
seconded by Mortensen, to table Agenda Item #3 until the September 29,
2003 meeting at the petitioner’s request. The motion carried
unanimously.
Open Public Hearing #4… The Township is proposing to amend the Master
Plan Future Land Use map. The area being considered for amendment is
location in Sections 33 and 34 in the southern portion of the Township
along the east side of Chilson Road, south of Brighton Road. The
amendment is intended to extend the water and sewer service area into
these sections and provide for residential densities at 2 to 4 dwellings
per acre.
· Planning Commission disposition of petition
A. Recommendation regarding Master Plan Amendment.
Chairman Pobuda advised the Planning Commission would not address this
issue as to the late hour this evening.
Moved by Figurski, seconded by Litogot, to approve the minutes of August
11, 2003. The motion carried unanimously.
Member Discussion
Ms. Huntley advised she will not be at the next two Planning Commission
meetings. She will return for the October 14, 2003 meeting.
Ms. Kolakowski noted that she gave each commissioner a copy of the
Michigan Society of Planning’s annual conference brochure. Please advise
her of any that you would like to attend.
Commissioner Mortensen questioned the need to put a tabling date on an
item, such as what was done with Agenda Item #3. Ms. Kolakowski advised
that the County Planning Commission is requiring this and the Township
Attorney feels it is a good practice. It was decided that this issue
will be discussed at the next joint meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 10:13 p.m.
Submitted by: Patty Thomas, Recording Secretary
Approved by: Barbara Figurski, Secretary
|
